Skip to Main Content U.S. Department of Energy
Marine Sciences Division
Page 5 of 27

Research Highlights

July 2018

Restoring Salmon Ecosystems on the Columbia River

New research quantifies the particulate organic matter benefit of re-connecting wetlands

July 2018
In rural southwest Washington state, new culverts replace a tide gate and reconnect a wetland to the Grays River and Columbia River estuary.

In rural southwest Washington state, new culverts replace a tide gate and reconnect a wetland to the Grays River and Columbia River estuary.

More than two centuries ago, Lewis and Clark navigated a wild Columbia River—with multiple channels, wide floodplains, and connected marshes, wetlands, and estuaries. Here and along the river’s numerous tributaries, they witnessed massive salmon migrations.

The picture is much different today. The once “Mighty Columbia” is channelized and fragmented, with highways, railroads, and dikes cutting off much of the river from wetlands and artificial flow controls altering historical flood patterns. Today’s salmon migrations are a mere fraction of what the Corps of Discovery marveled at so many years ago.

Those tasked with restoring ecosystem functions have long understood the benefit of reestablishing spawning grounds as well as solving the migratory challenges posed by hydroelectric infrastructure. Now, in a new paper published by Ecological Applications, (“Storm-driven particulate organic matter flux connects a tidal tributary floodplain wetland, mainstem river, and estuary”), researchers have quantified another piece of the salmon restoration puzzle: the impact of reconnecting former wetlands to improve the base of a healthy aquatic food web.

Heida Diefenderfer

Heida Diefenderfer, a restoration ecologist based at PNNL’s Marine Sciences Laboratory in Sequim, Washington, collects marsh macrodetritus along a transect using PVC quadrats and clippers. Researchers used the dry weight of biomass collected from the wetland restoration site to calibrate a sediment-transport model.

“Juvenile salmon rely on estuaries as nurseries—places to feed and grow,” explained Ronald Thom, the paper’s lead author and PNNL Staff Scientist Emeritus. “The food web that historically supported young salmon in the Columbia River was based on marsh microdetritus—the parts of wetland plants that die back every year during the fall and winter.”

A healthy concentration of zooplankton, insects, and other larval and adult invertebrates—all favorites on a young salmon’s breakfast menu—rely on this particulate organic matter at the base of the aquatic food web. However, in developed environments like today’s Columbia, the predominant source of particulate organic matter—wetlands—is often disconnected from the main-stem river or eliminated in favor of other land uses.

“Although it is known that rivers can export large quantities of organic matter to the coastal ocean, this research shows that restored and reconnected floodplain wetlands contribute to adjacent estuarine habitats, and play a significant role in rehabilitating estuarine food webs important to endangered salmon populations,” Thom said.

Location of the study area in the Columbia River estuary. The H-POM (particulate organic matter [POM] derived from the annually senescent aboveground parts of herbaceous marsh plants) flux study was conducted at the Grays River, which empties into Grays Bay. Tidal influence extends to Bonneville Dam, located at the extreme bottom right corner of the figure (not shown). Enlarge Image

The Columbia is a big river, so how can policymakers prioritize wetland restoration and reconnection? And importantly, how far away from the main-stem river can reconnected wetlands still be impactful? These are questions ecologists are now considering on a 145-mile stretch of the Columbia—from the Pacific Ocean to the Bonneville Dam, 40 miles east of Portland, Oregon.

Advancing Terrestrial Aquatic Research

PNNL’s Marine Sciences Laboratory is an important Department of Energy asset in understanding the role of aquatic ecosystems in earth system dynamics. “As an established global leader in earth system science, PNNL is now advancing into the new frontier of terrestrial-aquatic ecosystems,” said Charlette Geffen, Director of Research Strategy for PNNL’s Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate. “Through our internal investments and with those of key sponsors in DOE’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research, PNNL is pursuing an ambitious research program to unravel key mysteries of the earth system, and include our research findings in highly sophisticated models leveraging the full potential of high-performance computers.”

Researchers investigated the hypothesis that upon reconnecting a wetland, particulate organic matter would reach the ecosystem of the main-stem river. They adapted a numerical hydrodynamic model “by setting up the sediment transport model to estimate movements of particulate organic mass derived annually from marsh plants,” explained corresponding author Heida Diefenderfer, a restoration ecologist based at PNNL’s Marine Sciences Laboratory in Sequim, Washington.

The PNNL-led research team studied particulate organic matter export from a recently reconnected wetland along the Grays River in Washington state, a tidally affected tributary near the mouth of the Columbia River. Here, modeling indicated that the Columbia Land Trust’s reconnection of its 160-acre property, located about 4.5 miles from the main-stem river, would release large quantities of organic material, primarily during storm flooding events in the autumn and early winter.

Modeling demonstrated that particulate organic matter produced in a tributary wetland cumulatively affects a river as far as 4.5 miles downstream, including nearby restoration sites, and even in areas upstream from the wetland in regions affected by tidal reversal.

The modeling also confirmed that new culverts, as well as flooding events, can be important conduits for the exchange and transport of organic material. And it supports the notion that restoring hydrological connections is a viable strategy for enhancing contributions to the Columbia’s food web. Restoration like this is central to the Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program that is supported by research done by PNNL Marine Sciences Laboratory scientists.

While these results are encouraging for restoration ecologists and hungry young salmon alike, Diefenderfer says that wetlands function best collectively. “We have been researching the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration projects for over a decade,” she said. “The data clearly demonstrate the principles we hypothesized in a 2011 Ecological Restoration paper and showed in a 2012 Landscape Ecology paper and a 2016 Ecosphere paper: Wetland restoration projects can build upon each other. If you’re restoring more than one project in an area, the cumulative effect is significant. We found that not only is organic material moving out to the main-stem river, it is also enriching adjacent tidal wetlands.”

This work is finding potential applications beyond the salmon food web. As the PNNL researchers modified hydrodynamic modeling methods to measure the transport of organic matter, they believe that their work can be applied to the flow of carbon in earth system models, linking terrestrial model components to ocean components. “Exploring modeling approaches such as those demonstrated by this study can fill an important gap in understanding the role of the terrestrial-aquatic system in the global biogeochemical cycle,” explained Ruby Leung, chief scientist for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) project.

For the planners and policymakers focused on bringing back a measure of the Columbia River’s ecological health, the holistic aspects of this research illustrate the potential of further wetland restoration. “In our lifetimes, we’re unlikely to see the salmon migrations witnessed by Lewis and Clark,” Diefenderfer concluded. “But with a more complete understanding of the mechanisms of factors like carbon and nitrogen fluxes linking landscapes, we’re building an ecological strategy for the future.”

PNNL Research Team: Ronald Thom, Stephen Breithaupt, Heida Diefenderfer, Amy Borde, G. Curtis Roegner (NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Services), Gary Johnson, and Dana Woodruff

Funding: This research was funded by the Portland District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under the Columbia River Fish Project.

Page 5 of 27

Marine Sciences Laboratory

Research Areas

PNNL Websites